positive discrimination? i thought the word "discrimination" itself is an evil connotation? how could it be possibly positive when the sole objective here is to meet targets?
at what price positive discrimination? quality is sacrificed for the sake of racial - and to a lesser extent sexual - balance? hasn't this pc nonsense gone a tad too far?
"The majority of those deselected were white men because the force's workforce is over-represented by white men."
so? hell, i'd go to the extent of initiating a lawsuit if i were being discriminated against in my own country.
as enscribed by the letter b @ November 29, 2005 09:58 AM | someone's pingedas long as the lawyer ain't a certain Ms Booth, QC. 'nuff said.
as blahed by the letter b @ November 29, 2005 02:40 PMTry suing as a white male. Don't think it'll happen. Would be fun to watch tho.
as blahed by "Alice" @ November 29, 2005 01:38 PM