November 29, 2005

wee island hypocrisy

a fine example of which being attention whore's

who took up job's cavorting in clobber that left little to the imagination at motorcar, IT, etc exhibitions - and then whining *loudly* about "rude" lecherous types:
1. ogling at em till the cow's come home
2. puttin their pictures up on the interweb
3. and then rating, commenting or criticisin their trunks
4. and this takes the biscuit: for not accordin em any "respect" whatsoever

:: splutter ::

YET these same feckless bint's admit it was the high-payin "salary" [no "conservative" chink's would do it if it's otherwise] that enticed em to take up the no-brainer "job" that doesn't require em to do much. except enticin blokes to drop by the exhibitor's booth's.

duh.

what's goin on at the wee island blog forum [soz for the non-linking as the trackback leads those amoebae to this site] is that said feckless bint's:
1. presumin their detractor's to be conservative narrow-minded male who are no different from animal's those rude oglin lecherous type's
2. claimin they had the guts and self confidence to wear uniform's that doesn't cover much of their trunk's - as well as totterin around in "high" heel's
3. takin offence at the insults hurled as an attack on their "moral fibre" - amongst other thing's

someone commented that their poor defence is akin to someone puttin on a clown suit and then expecting us not to giggle.

their hypocrisy is so immense it's stifling.

as enscribed by the letter b @ November 29, 2005 10:10 AM | someone's pinged
yer six pences' worth s'il vous plaît:









remember personal info?