yet another hoo-ha over the issue of veiled bird's in the UK brought up by a former Foreign Secretary.
the argument made by bird's who chose to veil emselves on their own free will - with absolute non-interference or non-subjugation by their menfolk - bordered on the arrogance. *misplaced* arrogance more like.
cover by all means, but don't shove your warped ideal's down everyone's throat. what really got my goat is their defiantly fundamentalist behaviour coupled with their massive persecution complex.
methinks they are a danger to society, more so than some of their menfolk whose sole objective is to score with 72 virgin's. they may come across as educated, which gives them the [false] "confidence" to assert their right's. but they have no fuckin sense of fair play.
not much of a difference then from non-muslim bird's who think it's perfectly alright to assault our senses by flauntin their minimally-covered trunk's. in the name of women's liberation and such other tripe. which methinks is a rather poor excuse to behave badly.
and these are the same cow's who are allowed to breed. i weep for the future of humankind.
as enscribed by the letter b @ October 7, 2006 02:50 PM | someone's pinged