now, em wee lad's and lasses are told that they have legal *rights*.
:: snort ::
it was not too long ago that parent's were told to treat their precious as adult's. and my younger cousin's - beneficiaries of such a fashionable "upbringin" and still in their teen's - think they are just way beyond any form of reproach.
besides being utterly resentful of my casting dirty looks at their slutty get-up's. i suggested to one of em once that it'd be better for her to gallivant around town *starkers. if they have no ounce of self-respect, i don't see why i should even take any form of interest in em. just because they happen to be matured [yeah, i wager their brains are kinda stunted - wot with all the premature growin up] and clever.
me arse. but of course with a dodgy education system like the wee islet's, gormless amoebae who can't string a decent sentence in english are even qualified to graduate from university.
so it doesn't take a rocket scientist to work out why the mere idea of motherhood scares me.
does it? but then fate is tricky.
* if she were violated, it is the perpertrator who's to be blamed, innit? for the sheer inability to keep his paw's to himself. or that he has no respect [haw, haw] towards bird's, some of you's would argue. indeed. but to be dressed like a harlot, it's like inviting low-life scum to violate you [like yer hollerin: "QUICK! PAW ME!! AND IT'S FREE!!!"] which ain't necessarily physical. don't you think? also, surely we cannot expect fella's from certain cultural backgrounds to possess exact same idea's on *civilised* treatment of bird's. nor should we impose our *values* on them which are subjective.