what with news lately of clueless and fucked-up politician's gettin themselves into deep dodo, i wonder if the whole of the UK would take kindly to an absolute monarchy? [yeah, i know, it's a right anachronism.. blah.. you must be jokin it's the 21st century!.. blah and summat]
look at the Queen. she reigns [as opposed to "rules" which some "republican" amoebae got themselves mighty confused with] with grace, dignity and dedication. unlike em elected bunch of nitwit's who are supposed to serve the people. instead takin each and every one of you's for fool's.
but of course, there are argument's that she - along with her family - is Gerry to begin with. but hey, ain't 99.7% of em english are also? where dya reckon the words "Anglo" and "Saxon" come from then? i know a tad of a misnomer that, when most have got some Viking, Roman, Celt, Jew and a dash of Frog even.
oh and another thing that's been in me mind. if First Lady Blair is really a true-blue republican that she claims to be, how come she doesn't call for a change in her work title of QC? she couldn't exactly come up with an alternative, could she?
again, how much did she spend on her barnet?
as enscribed by the letter b @ April 26, 2006 05:42 PM | someone's pingedThey are all corrupt wankers. Nuff said.
as blahed by krip @ April 27, 2006 03:06 PMheh. i'd thought of recommendin her my hairdresser who does an excellent [ok i could be biased but i'm already with her for six year's now] job at a fraction of the total price she paid throughout the election campaign.
as blahed by the letter b @ April 27, 2006 11:08 AM"again, how much did she spend on her barnet?"
If one goes by the piccys in the news rags or on the telly, apparently not nearly enough.
as blahed by "Alice" @ April 27, 2006 07:32 AM