August 26, 2005

anti-bird

ere's an article by a disgruntled bloke who apparently is venting his spleen.

about the double-standard's practised by wee island bird's. especially the younger set.

i can't agree with him more. i've had witnessed and heard stories of messy divorce's, extra-marital affair's and wotnot, that i can safely conclude the birds' charter is but an ancient piece of law that no longer serves any purpose.

bird's are now financially independant and have equal earning power's, ta - or no thanks - to the said charter. unlike when i first started working back in 1986, whereby it was commonplace to see two different salary structures on job advert's:
a. those who have served national service - $380
b. those who don't - $350

yes, salaries back then were pathetic. by today's standard's that is.

yet em spoilt bint's these days still whine about sexual discrimination on the wee isle? no, measure a fella's worth by the size or bulge of his wallet, more like it.

sickenin, innit, the whole lot of em?

as enscribed by the letter b @ August 26, 2005 06:24 AM | someone's pinged

he's a regular contributor to the daily rag of a broadsheet, who's also a racist towards whites. somebody called him an incorrigible sexist once which almost broke out into a slangin match.

as blahed by the letter b @ August 26, 2005 02:37 PM

Oooo! Somebody sure twisted and pulled that man's shorthairs at one time.

as blahed by "Alice" @ August 26, 2005 01:51 PM
yer six pences' worth s'il vous plaît:









remember personal info?