a bunch of psychologists, after analysing result's of thousand's of cognitive ability tests,
concluded that blokes are a tad smarter than bird's.
i'm not disputing the finding's. however i'd like to put forward the followin question: if bloke's know for sure that they are the more intelligent of the lot, how come 99.98% still have got problem's dealin with bird's who are as clever?
and how come they find it appealin mating with the "undemanding" [in their own word's] defective type's - or rather, those who appear to be as such at first sight? it all boils down to the ego innit?
i was told once [many many many ::ad infinitum:: moon's ago] to dumb several notches down in order to increase my marriageability. apart from wearin more frock's, and growin my trademark short crop out.
i didn't hesitate to tell the cunt exactly where to go though.
not before larfin out loud in her mug.
as enscribed by the letter b @ August 26, 2005 06:01 AM | someone's pingedyep, that explains the biasedness innit? both sexes have their strengths and weaknesses, so no contest.
as blahed by the letter b @ August 26, 2005 02:38 PMI think that it was blokes who did the research in the first place.
as blahed by "Alice" @ August 26, 2005 01:52 PM