so em cheatin italiano's are at it again, doin what they know best - ie: diving inside the penalty box. or was it the 6- or 9-yard box?
soz, i didn't watch the match at all, so i had to rely on em commentator's on live radio. together with the ref collaboratin, em cheat's made sure they get their way. even if it meant play acting. and they *conveniently* won a spot-kick. on injury time, mind.
wankin bastard's. and how cruel it is for em Aussies who played rather well.
or so i thought.
as enscribed by the letter b @ June 27, 2006 11:33 AM | someone's pingednot surprising, is it that em frog's resort to cheating also? it's only those contemptible few who are desperately seeking [personal] glory who'd resort to backhanded tactics.
that's one thing i totally hate about world cup and i think i've explained why before. in this day and age, nothin is sacred especially in the pursuit of fame and dosh. perhaps i should point you to this blog whereby the journo asked if this world cup is the dirtiest of all: http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/sport/davidbond/jun06/wagsproveanunseemlydistraction.htm
you need to scroll down past the tosh about em WAG's. as i didn't watch much of it on the telly - saved for the Gerry v costa rica 2nd half, i don't think my two penneth's worth holds water.
as blahed by the letter b @ June 28, 2006 05:04 AMNow that Spain are out and the French are in (with a cheating Mr. Henry to boot), unless the Argies win that damn thing, this has to be the worst World Cup. We have had appalling standards of refereeing and that is spoiling my enjoyment of the whole damn thing. Is nothing sacred anymore?
as blahed by D W @ June 27, 2006 09:44 PM