April 19, 2006

discrepencies

is it just me, or does anyone else out there notice that this twit twat [ed: ta muchly to krip for pointing it out] who has gone completely off his rocker is actually old enough to be the wee bairn's granpa?

on another note, how come nobody - and i repeat NOBODY - accuses him of being a cradle-snatcher?

oh, hang on, it could be his bird who actually needs a father figure to guide her along. or perhaps the boost she urgently requires to get a quick head start in movieland.

cunning wee wotsit.

as enscribed by the letter b @ April 19, 2006 06:16 PM | someone's pinged

hmm.. t*mk@t = twit-twat. fitting that, non? seriously, i pity the wee bairn for what's in store for her.

*princess*, indeed. bah. btw, some circus is missin its freak.

:D

as blahed by the letter b @ April 20, 2006 07:53 AM

The twat is a freak.

as blahed by "Alice" @ April 20, 2006 07:00 AM

ta for pointing that out, krip :) a fine example of poor finger-eye co-ordination, not verifying the entry, etc etc etc..

as blahed by the letter b @ April 20, 2006 06:38 AM

Surely you mean, twat :)

as blahed by krip @ April 20, 2006 05:52 AM
yer six pences' worth s'il vous plaît:









remember personal info?