it may just be my being a shameless erm, monarchist; but the vitriol hurled by certain section's of the public towards Harry's impending call-up to Iraq doesn't make any sense whatsoever.
especially those made by reader's of the daily mail, which i can't seem to find the link today. well, what i had blahed - i just had to - on the comments section on the m.e.n is more than suffice. and i must say that the falklands war kinda earnt randy andy some respect - he even dumped that porn actress slag shortly after his return.
and the difference in quality of opinion between m.e.n's and daily mail's is that no feckless bird has yet to say their piece in the former. so far.
i must admit it's an oversight on my part that royalty are not put on the line of fire.
as enscribed by the letter b @ January 26, 2006 12:17 PM | someone's pingednah, it's alright. do remind me then if its ok for you Alice, so that i can wish him all the best - through you :)
as blahed by the letter b @ January 27, 2006 10:22 AMOh, sorry, save the "is doing okay in Iraq" until June or July. That's when he's off again. I should have put that part in.
as blahed by "Alice" @ January 27, 2006 09:33 AMi'm sure the Queen would give him her blessings given her military stint during the war - i respect her loads. but the problem would be the courtiers and some politician's who would quote some ancient by-laws.
hope your son-in-law is doin okay in Iraq, alice!
as blahed by the letter b @ January 26, 2006 01:22 PMWell, I look at it this way. If you join the military, than you serve in the military and you go and do wherever those orders order you to go and do.
And hey, if my son-in-law can be served orders to Iraq (for the second time), than so be it for the Prince.;)
as blahed by "Alice" @ January 26, 2006 01:16 PM