i know, a right gobful that.
and i thought i am the only one who holds the view that bird's these days are a bunch of hypocritical defective banshee's - especially those of the wee island variety.
banshee's 'cos they'd inevitably wail at some perceived "slight". or insult hurled at by blokes. of course.
and may i add, education and even the right to equal job and pay opportunities are mightily wasted on said defective banshee's. when i first started workin in october 1986, it wasn't an uncommon practice to see job advert's displayin two different salary scales - those who served national service [read: male] and those who ain't [read: bird's] or who were exempted from conscription.
only for some female "activists" to grumble at such grave injustice during the early year's of the last decade. that parliament decided to make it an offence for companies to carry on the practice. where had they been all this while? said parliament?
what's more astonishin is in spite of all the equality, em so-called young tertiary-educated wee island bint's [especially so the lowest common denominator riff-raff - or chavette's in short] spout bollocks about findin wealthy husband's to upkeep em. besides installin said bint's in palatial homes with private swimmin pool's, round-the-clock security and suchlike. 'cos it's their *duty* to do so. as a husband.
thus the objective of landing a "rich" white expat - usually an ex-chav from the council estate back home. what's more amazin is that these sod's are willing enough to let emselves become a trophy husband. but then again, like attract like, innit?
in short, i really feel sorry for those fine women of yore who struggled and stood up for what they believed in - especially the right for bird's to work. and vote.
and a word to today's twattin cunt's - boo. hiss.
as enscribed by the letter b @ December 29, 2005 05:42 AM | someone's pinged