December 11, 2005

for selfish reason's

is the need to keep up with the joneses so great

that grandparent's feel the need to pressurise their bairn to reproduce?

the claim of continuin the family line [or what older ethnic chink's would utter "to carry on the surname" - that's why they favour male bairn's] is utterly *lame* as most would end up as surrogate parent's themselves. and then having to supervise the foreign domestic helper hired to keep house - as in the wee island context that is.

to be honest, are youngling's these days ready for parenthood? they may think they are, but the rise in numbers of unruly spoilt brat's shows otherwise. and then us the public are to put up with all the ill-behaviour, eh?

worse, these clueless parent's not only choose to pretend their sprog's are angels, but are gallin enough to think they are now more complete individual's just because they'd fulfilled their duty of procreation.

twattin cunt's.

moreoever, what with the planet dyin due to man's indiscriminate destruction, isn't it time for a break in human reproduction?

just imagine, lesser spastic's to deal with also.

as enscribed by the letter b @ December 11, 2005 05:49 AM | someone's pinged

thank god my granny or my mum never "pressurise" me to reproduce.

phew.

but then again, i'm not the one who's gonna perpetuate the family name. heh as if it's the sole purpose of our existence. i'd rather save the planet.

as blahed by the letter b @ December 13, 2005 10:23 AM

Duh! For a minute there, before reading the said article, I thought you were talking about your grannie.

as blahed by "Alice" @ December 13, 2005 10:19 AM
yer six pences' worth s'il vous plaît:









remember personal info?