if parent's have no right whatsoever to know about their underage bairn's abortions, will the government or NHS assume responsibility to look after the bairn's emotional well-being, post-abortion?
or is this a cunning plan to prevent more teenager's from becomin mother's? or worse, are they followin the wee islet's example whereby teenaged cow's could abort as many times as they wish without their parent's consent?
hmm.. why not take this opportunity to neuter em teenager's as well?
as enscribed by the letter b @ November 8, 2005 02:15 PM | someone's pingedso in matters like abortion or buyin the morning-after pill over the counter, the state overrules the parents? what kind of message are we sendin out to em bairns?
as blahed by the letter b @ November 9, 2005 12:46 PMIt's the same in the US. A little girl (aged 13-14 or so) can't get their ears pierced without parental consent, but they can get an abortion. God help if one of these bairns die on the abortion table.
as blahed by "Alice" @ November 9, 2005 11:25 AM