apparently this media mogul is goin through a series of bad luck. sorta.
firstly, his heir quit the family biz. and now this. it seems that having an ambitious gold-digger as a missus doesn't translate into unlimited access; and penetration into the vast untapped peopre's lepubrik market.
i read with utter disgust - off an article - whilst workin at the former madhouse of a workplace [which said mogul has a 50% share] that divulged lurid details of his and her motives of marryin each other.
one of which was her promise of gettin authorities to agree to give the network unprecedented rights - or favour's more like it. in addition to claim's that she knew some of them personally. all this took place when she walked in straight to his room without makin any prior appointment. or so it was claimed.
at that time she was just a mere newly-employed junior executive who couldn't wait to rise to the top. the length's some folk would go to impress the gaffer, eh? i guess her wantin to have a share in his vast inheritance is partly fulfilled now that he has amended his will. to include their two wee bairn.
she typifies the characteristics of a mainland chink gold-digger - that her compatriot's are not too chuffed to be labelled as such over ere. well, ain't 99.9% of bird's - with ambition's to marry up - everywhere are?
in short, i just dislike em both. and who could forget that said mogul had design's on manyooooo back in 1998? what does an aussie know about footy anyway?
well, well, well. we might just be witnessin the beginning of the downfall of a mighty empire, eh. and i shall watch by the sidelines with glee.
as enscribed by the letter b @ September 19, 2005 12:14 PM | someone's pingedyep, another cautionary tale, this. greed takes you nowhere.
as blahed by the letter b @ September 20, 2005 09:55 AMThe higher up the ladder one climbs, the more keen on the arse is felt the pain.
as blahed by "Alice" @ September 20, 2005 08:38 AM