i may be a bird myself, but there are many an occasion that most of my fellow bird's left me perplexed/aghast/gobsmacked [see? i meself am confused] by their, erm, logic.
or a severe lack of. without further ado, sample the followin:
...She posed in a bikini for a men's magazine and, like many women, wore a miniskirt socially. But what gaming room attendant Susie Zhang did in her private life ended up being used against her in court.
Ms Zhang had complained that her employer had no right to ask her to wear a miniskirt at work, but Federal Magistrate Rolf Driver found against her...
and the reason for her whinge?
.. the obligation to wear short skirts upon the basis that this treated her as a 'sex object'...
reet. so posin for a lad's mag in a bikini isn't objectification whatsoever? if you ain't exactly chuffed with havin to wear wee skirts at the workplace, luv, go work elsewhere.
btw, it might had been the way she portrayed herself whilst wearin that "offensive" piece of garment that led her ex-employer to molest her. also, with a gaffer named Con wotsit, that sure is a hint to not even touch him with a barge pole.
duh.
as enscribed by the letter b @ April 28, 2005 04:04 PM