i'm amazed that at this day and age, there are folk out there who interpret foreign news completely out of context.
now, i have nothing against them giving their two penneth's worth on international current affairs. but to:
1. compare the disparity in standards/wealth/blah between the other party and theirs
2. and then proceeding to tell the blue marble how the other party are but a bunch of lucky sods just because
3. and worse, quoting the entire piece of "news" *without* even grasping the gist of it
it leaves me a totally poor impression of these gormless ameoba. and i thought 99.5% of wee islanders possessing third-world mentality is sad enough.
really, if you's have nothing brilliant to twaddle about, don't. don't get me wrong, it's not that i can't accept criticisms or alternative points of view. it's just that they simply weren't in the first place.
as enscribed by the letter b @ August 6, 2004 05:38 AMreet. would be grateful if you could come up with a more common/convincing name like everybody else does. other than financial help or online casino.
spamming wankers.
as blahed by the letter b @ August 12, 2004 03:57 AM